Cases 11 - 20 of 1,800
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Spinner Equipment Group Intermediate Holdings, Inc. et al v. Farmer et al
as 3:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Spinner Equipment Group Intermediate Holdings, Inc. and Elgin Power and Separation Solutions, LLC f/k/a Elgin Equipment Group, LLC, as successor-in-interest to Elgin National Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Jerry Farmer and Mineral Products, Inc.
Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Seth Steidinger
Defendant:
Blackstone Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Burnett v. Monticello High School
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Melinda Burnett
Defendant:
Monticello High School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hughes v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Emisiah Hughes
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gilleland v. Express Scripts, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Abbie Gilleland
Defendant:
Express Scripts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
