Cases 101 - 110 of 135
Hucko v. JMC Partnership
as 1:2010cv06734
Plaintiff:
Christopher T Hucko
Defendant:
JMC Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vann v. YOung Men's Christian Association of Chicago
as 1:2010cv03267
Petitioner:
Barnita P. Vann
Respondent:
Young Men's Christian Association of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss Development Company v. S2 Art Group, LTD
as 1:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
Moss Development Company
Defendant:
S2 Art Group, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deerfield Square Limited Partnership v. The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01523
Plaintiff:
Deerfield Square Limited Partnership
Defendant:
The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Nettles v. U-Store It
as 1:2009cv07970
Plaintiff:
Tammy Nettles
Defendant:
U-Store It
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
as 1:2009cv05824
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Arboretum of South Barrington, LLC v. Aerial Company Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04507
Defendant:
Aerial Company Inc., Aerial Company Inc., Beauty Shoppe.Biz, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Arboretum of South Barrington, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Robin Realty & Management Co. v. R. Benderson 1995 Trust
as 1:2009cv03902
Defendant:
R. Benderson 1995 Trust
Plaintiff:
Robin Realty & Management Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
UG Prairie Stone, LP v. Famous Dave's Ribs-U, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01796
Plaintiff:
UG Prairie Stone, LP
Defendant:
Famous Dave's Ribs-U, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Village Green Management v. Larkins et al
as 1:2009cv01474
Plaintiff:
Village Green Management
Defendant:
Kiyah Larkins and Lennon Terry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
