Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodney Guilbeau, et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al
as 17-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY GUILBEAU, DAVID M. KOZAK, WALTER MCGILL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER INC. and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC
Aaron v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01189
Plaintiff:
Damon Aaron
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pippin v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10896
Plaintiff:
Lyle Pippin
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horn v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10476
Plaintiff:
Randy Horn
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08990
Plaintiff:
John Chaney
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04085
Plaintiff:
Dale Edwards
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixson et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv02558
Plaintiff:
Freamon Dixson and Madeline Dixson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pettrey et al v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Marshall Pettrey and Kim Pettrey
Defendant:
Paddock Laboratories, Inc., Perrigo Company, PLC, Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shumake v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00819
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Shumake
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC, Actavis, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tastet, Jr. v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leroy J. Tastet, Jr.
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
