Cases 1 - 10 of 36
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kowalski
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
William A Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Harmon v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
as 3:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Sue Harmon
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Binder v. United States Polo Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02910
Plaintiff:
Demetra Binder
Defendant:
United States Polo Association, Inc., USPA Properties, Inc. and Does 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Earl et al v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Earl and Jeanette Rock
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sims v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 1:2022cv06140
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Sims
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Martinez v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05664
Plaintiff:
Dianna Martinez
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bernadette Bogdanovs v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 1:2022cv03143
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Bogdanovs
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vaughn v. McDonough et al
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Burdell Vaughn
Defendant:
Denis R. McDonough and United States Department of Veterns Affairs, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Morris v. Unilever United States Incorporated
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Antonio Morris
Defendant:
Unilever United States Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barnes et al v. Unilever United States Incorporated
as 1:2021cv06191
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Barnes, Patricia Dean, Antonio Morris and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
