Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Perez v Oishi Asian Express Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02377
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Oishi Asian Express Inc and Renmin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas E Perez v. New Chinatown Express Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
New Chinatown Express Inc and Renmin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. TSHO, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10795
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
TSHO, Inc., EKYU, Inc., Haruhisa Osada and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Zaibak Brothers and Company et al
as 1:2016cv05474
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Zaibak Brothers and Company and Khaled Elzeibak, an individual
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. United Floor Installers, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08195
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
United Floor Installers, Inc. and Michael Knautz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Mike's Refinishing Corporation, an Illinois Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv06722
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Mike's Refinishing Corporation , Mike's Decorating and Painting, Inc and Michael Nastepniak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Brazzaz LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03495
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Brazzaz LLC and Sergio Aguirre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. DT & C Global Management LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
DT & C Global Management LLC , John Jansen and William Lynch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Expertize Masonry, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01745
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Expertize Masonry, Inc. and Pawel Walaszek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Omega Restaurant, Ltd et al
as 1:2014cv03255
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Omega Restaurant, Ltd and James Chiampas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
