Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Central States, Southeast and, et al v. CLP Venture LLC, et al
as 13-1132
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and ARTHUR H. BUNTE, JR.
Defendant - Appellant: CLP VENTURE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, JM VENTURE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, LATHROP STAR, LTD, an Illinois corporation and others
Central States Southeast and S, et al v. Messina Products LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1333
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and ARTHUR H. BUNTE, JR.
Defendant - Appellant: MESSINA PRODUCTS, LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company
Teamsters Local Union No. 705, et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe C, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3705
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 705, FELIPE GONZALEZ, RICHARD W. KASSL and others
Defendant - Appellee: BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION, a Delaware limited liability company, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Delaware corporations, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation and others
Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Pension Fund and Welfare Funds v. Probuild North LLC, formerly known as F. E. Wheaton & Co., a limited liability corporation
as 1:2010cv07907
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Pension Fund and Welfare Funds
Defendant: Probuild North LLC, formerly known as F. E. Wheaton & Co., a limited liability corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Central States Southeast and S, et al v. SCOFBP, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3633
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Trustee
Defendant - Appellant: SCOFBP, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company, MCOF/MISSOURI, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company and MCRI/ILLINOIS, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company
Central States, Southeast and, et al v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2489
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, trustee
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Delaware limited liability company
Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al
as 1:2009cv04552
Plaintiff: Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant: Rega Pipeline LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None
Central States Southeast and S, et al v. Superior Cartage Company, Inco, et al
as 08-2763
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD MCDOUGALL
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERIOR CARTAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, an Indiana Corporation and SUPERIOR PACKING SYSTEMS, LLC, an Indiana limited liability Company
Central States Southeast and S, et al v. Active Transportation Company
as 08-1645
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, HOWARD MCDOUGALL, trustee and CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Appellant: ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Kentucky limited liability corporation
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Lewis Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00102
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Lewis Truck Lines, Inc., Lewis Truck Lines, Inc., Lewis Truck Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?