Cases 41 - 50 of 1,944
Diaz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02677
Plaintiff:
Antonio Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCrory v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kendra M. McCrory
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Russell P Nelson
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Gina M. Hall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bentley v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Luther Bentley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Alexander
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McCullough v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Kathy McCullough
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02410
Plaintiff:
Yolanda R. Jordan
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anders v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02396
Plaintiff:
John Anders
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hughes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah E. Hughes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
