Cases 31 - 39 of 39
RRK Holding Company v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 08-3277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RRK HOLDING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a New York corporation
Bayer Clothing Group, Incorpor v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 08-3246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAYER CLOTHING GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
RRK Holding Company v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 08-2599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RRK HOLDING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a New York corporation
Jones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2008cv02951
Plaintiff:
Jovan Jones
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Orlando Coryell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Compa, et al
as 08-2244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO CORYELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a New York corporation doing business as The Great Outdoors, both owned by Sears Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, JOHN T. BOWMAN and others
Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Tyco Fire Products, LP et al
as 1:2008cv02838
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products, LP, Simplexgrinnell, LP, Star Sprinkler, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bayer Clothing Group, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2007cv02395
Plaintiff:
Bayer Clothing Group, Inc. and Bayer Clothing Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coryell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv00754
Plaintiff:
Orlando Coryell
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Sears Roebuck and Company, John T Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Apex Digital Inc v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
as 07-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APEX DIGITAL, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
