Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Christian Mata v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN MATA
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHANDLER ARIZONA
Ben Kinney v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
BEN KINNEY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Mata v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv50049
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chandler Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kinney v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02523
Plaintiff:
Ben Kinney
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gorgas et al v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05159
Plaintiff:
Benita Gorgas and Nelson Gorgas
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com Services, LLC., Amazon.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Keiser v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2022cv04554
Plaintiff:
Shawna Keiser
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2022cv04357
Plaintiff:
Sam Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. v. CEVA Freight, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03763
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc.
Defendant:
CEVA FREIGHT, LLC, doing business as CEVA LOGISTICS, CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05336
Plaintiff:
Tanya Svoboda and Tanya N. Svoboda
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaeffer v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01080
Plaintiff:
April Schaeffer
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
