Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Armstrong v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12107
Plaintiff:
Angelica Armstrong
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. Hoskins Dow et al
as 1:2020cv01271
Defendant:
Elizabeth Hoskins Dow, Elizabeth Daley Hoskins Dow, Jeannine Parker-Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Denise Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. AFSCME Council 31 et al
as 1:2019cv06793
Defendant:
AFSCME Council 31, Glendora Marshall, David Dover and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palkon v. Berglass et al
as 1:2017cv03233
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palkon
Defendant:
Robert Berglass, Christopher W. Shean, Robin S. Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atallah v. Apatoff et al
as 1:2017cv02773
Plaintiff:
Nabil Atallah
Defendant:
Robert S. Apatoff, Christopher W. Shean, Becky A. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Indiana Insurance Company v. Sonbonita et al
as 1:2012cv10226
Plaintiff:
Indiana Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sanbonita Armstrong, Stacy Jones, 40% Plus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Armstrong v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2012cv07962
Plaintiff:
Glen Armstrong, Sr.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Armstrong Law Firm, P.C.
as 1:2011cv03045
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Armstrong Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
