Intellectual Property Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 48
ABC Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03301
Plaintiff: ABC Corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Leregle, Sisin and others
Counter Claimant: SUNPOLIN, YIEAR, Macro Camera and others
Respondent: AIFI Camera, Ear Zeus, MIUKA and others
Intervenor Defendant: EarSemil, KCamera and EarZhou
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Patent Holder As Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-251, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff: Patent Holder As Identified in Exhibit 1, Doe 3 ALE US and Shenzhen Huagou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Does 1-251, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 1 Ajna Alignment, Doe 2 AK-YouYiB and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SEMK Products Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv06365
Plaintiff: SEMK Products Limited
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, AOCHU Store, Blessed Life Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Rimowa GmbH v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05523
Plaintiff: Rimowa GmbH
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 001 Friend Dropshippin Store, 168Small Fortunate Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Great Bowery, Inc. v. Elite Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv04449
Plaintiff: GREAT BOWERY, Inc. d/b/a TRUNK ARCHIVE and Great Bowery, Inc. doing business as Trunk Archive
Defendant: ELITE ORTHOPAEDICS & SPORTS MEDICINE PLLC, CHANDRA SEKHAR SOMPALLI d/b/a SURGERY & WELLNESS INSTITUTE, TANYA SOMPALLI d/b/a SURGERY & WELLNESS INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02635
Plaintiff: General Motors LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, aozowoo, daboluo-03 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bad Vibes Forever, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00785
Plaintiff: Bad Vibes Forever, LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 00000011 Store, 006 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00480
Plaintiff: Marshall Amplification PLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", chorong, No problem - outdoor equipment Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yu v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff: QINFENG YU
Defendant: THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A", The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A, FREEFA and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv06096
Plaintiff: Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Quanzhou Etdz Conbelife Business Trading Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Kufeng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?