Cases 41 - 50 of 647
Dorna Sports, S.L. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations, Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Dorna Sports, S.L.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations, Identified on Schedule A Hereto, CXJQ Store, DaMaStart Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Roblox Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Roblox Corporation
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, Zhejiang Choice Fun Home Furnishing Co., Ltd., Dongyang Chenchen Jewelry Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Haoyuanxin Jewelry Co., Ltd., Foshan Mingyang Textile Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Roblox Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Roblox Corporation
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, aristor, bxsj-37 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Chongqing Xuesheng Clothing Ltd., Company, Dongguan Marlary Jewelry Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gemmell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Mark Gemmell
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, hengyangshixiaoguiwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, LoveTaoTao and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ai Tao Li Education Technology (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., Huizhou Yibish Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Albert Koetsier v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Albert Koetsier
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, DOU SHOP, guangzhouqiaolishangmaoyouxiangongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Schmitt v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Svenja Schmitt
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, sanbao town, shenzhenshipofengqixingyongpinyouxiangongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Yiwu Yuxin E-commerce Firm v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Yiwu Yuxin E-commerce Firm
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, Nanafast Store, Ycong and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
