Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04932
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", frerodelavegafans.com, Phil Shaver and others
Plaintiff: Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv02022
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", newjeresy, Xiawei shop and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv02687
Plaintiff: River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", leon herman, Kristen Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Haynes Furniture Company Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10665
Plaintiff: Restoration Hardware, Inc. and RH US, LLC
Defendant: Haynes Furniture Company Incorporated , New Venture Holdings, LLC and Highland Lombard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08322
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Shuyi Zhou and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom corporation et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2015cv02851
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom corporation and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Su Sheng, Chen Zhenquan, Ming Cheng Lin, and Owen Wu, collectively d/b/a YYW.COM and NEXT [YYW] and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Euromarket Designs, Inc. et al v. Haynes Furniture Company Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv07802
Plaintiff: Euromarket Designs, Inc. and Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Defendant: Haynes Furniture Company Incorporated and New Venture Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Naschem Company, LTD et al v. Sports Line Distributors, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02853
Plaintiff: Naschem Company, LTD, Naschem Company, LTD, Dae Up Sohn and others
Defendant: Sports Line Distributors, Inc., Sports Line Distributors, Inc., Martin Bruce Faierstain and others
Counter Claimant: Sports Line Distributors, Inc., Sports Line Distributors, Inc., Martin Bruce Faierstain and others
Counter Defendant: Naschem Company, LTD, Naschem Company, LTD, Naschem Company, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Naschem Company, LTD et al v. Sports Line Distributors, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00281
Plaintiff: Naschem Company, LTD and Dae Up Sohn
Defendant: Sports Line Distributors, Inc., Martin Bruce Faierstain, John Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Naschem Company, LTD et al v. Blackswamp Trading Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00730
Plaintiff: Naschem Company, LTD and Dae Up Sohn
Defendant: BLACKSWAMP TRADING, CO., Lamps, Inc. doing business as Environmental Recycling, Inc., Sports Line Distributors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?