Cases 1 - 10 of 40
McCuan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. McCuan
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02198
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
William H. Boards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv06275
Plaintiff:
Chirag H. Shah
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gabel v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv06156
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John H Gabel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Horstman v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv17091
Plaintiff:
Terrence H. Horstman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Potter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv02261
Plaintiff:
Pamela H Potter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hobson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv04089
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. Hobson
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Arellano De Rubio v. Saul
as 3:2021cv50042
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Rosa H. Arellano De Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00540
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Diana H Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv03337
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Darren H Williams
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
