Cases 111 - 120 of 122
H&R Block Tax Service v. Lorie Marshall, et al
as 09-8002
Petitioner:
H&R BLOCK TAX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
LORIE J. MARSHALL and DEBRA RAMIREZ
Ramirez v. Car Outlet, Inc.
as 1:2008cv06429
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Ramirez
Defendant:
Car Outlet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. v. Gus Produce Corp et al
as 1:2008cv06309
Plaintiff:
Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc. and Jack Tuchten Wholesale Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Gus Produce Corp, Gustavo Ramirez and Maria Serur
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ruben Ramirez-Solis v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-3497
Petitioner:
RUBEN RAMIREZ-SOLIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Beatricz Ramirez
as 08-3216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BEATRICZ RAMIREZ
Marshall et al v. H & R Block Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lorie J. Marshall and Debra Ramirez
Defendant:
H & R Block Inc, H & R Block Group, Inc., H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. et al v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2008cv03354
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. and J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Joel Ramirez, El Paso Restaurant, Inc. and Margarita Ramirez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gonzalez v. Calambas et al
as 1:2007cv02417
Plaintiff:
Julio C Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sonya Calambas, Amalia Ramirez and Ramona Acebedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
