Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al v. Borlabi et al
as 1:2014cv03073
Plaintiff:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Alcatel-Lucent Retirement Income Plan and Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension Plan
Defendant:
Samuel Borlabi, Albert Brown, Oscar Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Francisco Calderon-Acevedo
as 13-1015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
USA v. Ramon Calderon
as 12-3717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMON CALDERON
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Calderon et al
as 1:2012cv03121
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Arturo Calderon and Arturo's LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Calderon et al
as 1:2010cv07693
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Arturo Calderon and Arturo's Tacos, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maria Fernandez-Saiz Calderon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-1320
Petitioner:
MARIA ESTER FERNANDEZ-SAIZ CALDERON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Calderon et al
as 1:2009cv07039
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Arturo Calderon and Arturo's LLC. d/b/a Arturo's Tacos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DeBold v. Illinois Collection Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. DeBold and Thomas M. DeBold
Defendant:
Illinois Collection Service, Inc., S. Denson and C. Calderone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
