Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Hernandez Perez v. Wong et al
as 1:2017cv08580
Plaintiff:
Jeronimo Leonel Hernandez Perez
Defendant:
Ricardo A. Wong , Elaine C Duke , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Saquib et al v. Medina et al
as 1:2017cv08405
Plaintiff:
Abdul Saquib and Sana YOUSUF
Defendant:
Martha Medina and Elaine C Duke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Teymurzada et al v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv08147
Plaintiff:
Rauf Teymurzada and Oksana Permitina
Defendant:
Elaine Duke , L. Francis Cissna , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ballazhi et al v. Medina
as 1:2017cv08065
Plaintiff:
Brooke Ballazhi and Ilir Ballazhi
Defendant:
Martha Medina and Elaine Duke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Kryvko v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv07875
Plaintiff:
Oleksandr Kryvko
Defendant:
Elaine Duke , Martha Medina and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hameed v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv06742
Plaintiff:
Marwan Abdulkareem Hameed
Defendant:
Elaine Duke , James McCament , Kenneth Madsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Karimzadehtabrizi v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv06593
Plaintiff:
Hamid Karimzadehtabrizi
Defendant:
Elaine Duke , James McCament , Kenneth Madsen and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Peter Nebus v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-2672
Petitioner:
PETER NEBUS
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of Homeland Security, ELAINE C. DUKE, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Zivanovic et al v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv05695
Plaintiff:
Biljana Zivanovic and Ivan Saric
Defendant:
Elaine Duke and Martha Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
