Cases 11 - 20 of 30
William Davis, Jr. v. BOP, et al
as 20-2682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Department of S, et al
as 20-2237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Antonio Cantu v. DOJ, et al
as 20-1772
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO CANTU, also known as TONY CANTU
Michael Rankins v. USA, et al
as 19-2417
Defendant / Appellee:
J. LAMPING, Safety Compliance Administrator, HUGH J. HURWITZ, Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Antonio Crawford v. Matthew Kennelly, et al
as 19-1841
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MURPHY, UNKNOWN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Loevy & Loevy v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2016cv11747
Plaintiff:
Loevy & Loevy
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
White v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv00948
Plaintiff:
William A White
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Supermax, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2016cv01831
Plaintiff:
Supermax, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Federal Prison Industries
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ronald Williams v. Richard Schott, et al
as 14-2375
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, CLINT SWIFT, J. SIMMONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
