Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Lee v. Lugo et al
as 1:2021cv02158
Defendant:
JACQUELINE Lugo, Mary P Walldan and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ruben E Lee and Ruben E Lee, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ellis v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Rosella Ellis
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Medina v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2020cv07043
Defendant:
Takita Brown and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Medina Guadalupe and Guadalupe Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wayne Holmes v. Chicago Local 0001 Union, et al
as 20-2720
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, CHICAGO LOCAL 0001 UNION, CHICAGO LOCAL AMERICAN POSTALWORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE A. HOLMES
Osborne v. Village of Plainfield, Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv03654
Petitioner:
Frederick Osborne
Respondent:
Village of Plainfield, Illinois, United States Postal Service, Det. Sgt. Kevin Mcquaid of the Plainfield, Illinois Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kenneth Long v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 20-1375
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH B. LONG
Manuel Ocasio v. USPS
as 19-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL OCASIO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
NLRB v. USPS
as 19-2901
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Espada, Sr. v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv06539
Defendant:
Ontario Hopson and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Espada, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Walker v. Hopson
as 1:2018cv06543
Defendant:
Ontario Hopson and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ahmin Walker and Ahmin Zaid Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
