Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,584
Yousef Wishah v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1058
Petitioner: YOUSEF FATHI WISHAH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Joel Garcia-Abarca v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1020
Petitioner: JOEL GARCIA-ABARCA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Humberto Disla-Ripol v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3433
Petitioner: HUMBERTO DISLA-RIPOL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Matiushchenko v. Madsen et al
as 1:2023cv16997
Plaintiff: Olga Matiushchenko
Defendant: Director Kenneth Madsen, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramses Alvarez-Sanchez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3305
Petitioner: RAMSES ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Krystyna Sawicka v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3312
Petitioner: KRYSTYNA SAWICKA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Javier Carmona-Albarran v. Merrick B. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3278
Petitioner: JAVIER CARMONA-ALBARRAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Rene Palafox-Villanueva v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3279
Petitioner: RENE PALAFOX-VILLANUEVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Jose Contreras-Ortiz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3271
Petitioner: JOSE J. CONTRERAS-ORTIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Todd Rokita, et al
as 23-3247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: TODD ROKITA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of Indiana and RYAN MEARS, in his capacity as Marion County Prosecutor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?