Cases 31 - 40 of 1,580
Ivan Hernandez-Garcia v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3074
Petitioner:
IVAN HERNANDEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Heriberta Plancarte Martinez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3077
Petitioner:
HERIBERTA PLANCARTE MARTINEZ, D. R. G. P., a minor and W. J. G. P., a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Monica Aguilar Morales, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3056
Petitioner:
MONICA AGUILAR MORALES and P. V. M. A., a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Manuel Sumba-Yunga v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3046
Petitioner:
MANUEL DEIFILIO SUMBA-YUNGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Kwame Raoul v. 3M Company
as 23-3031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, People of the State of Illinois ex rel.
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
Antoni Garcia v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3024
Petitioner:
ANTONI GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Julio Vides-Vides v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3006
Petitioner:
JULIO C. VIDES-VIDES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Calderon et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv14713
Plaintiff:
Briceida Kayranee Calderon and Efren Huitron Franco
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
M. T. B. v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2941
Petitioner:
M. T. B.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Hafiz Jafar Ahmad v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2923
Petitioner:
HAFIZ NUR AHMAD BIN JAFAR AHMAD
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
