Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Bell, Thomas LLC, et al v. State Lottery Commission of In
as 21-2205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION OF INDIANA, doing business as THE HOOSIER LOTTERY
Bell, Thomas LLC, et al v. Indiana Sheriff's Office, et al
as 21-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL and BELL, THOMAS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA SHERIFF'S OFFICE and INTAKE CLASSIFICATION SHERIFF
Thomas Bell v. Indianapolis Indiana Police
as 21-1994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. C. Rivers, et al
as 21-1882
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN ASH, Doctor, C. RIVERS, MS. NELSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
USA v. Antonio Edwards
as 21-1874
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO EDWARDS, also known as RAYDUCE RASHAD, also known as RODNEY BELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Bell v. Carmen Commercial Real Estate
as 21-1851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMEN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES
Thomas P. Bell v. USA, et al
as 21-1807
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS P. BELL
USA v. Larry Bell
as 21-1819
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY D. BELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maria Williams-Bell v. British Standards Institution,
as 21-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA WILLIAMS-BELL, on behalf of herself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION, INC.
Richard Bell v. Integrity Wholesale Furniture,
as 21-1758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEGRITY WHOLESALE FURNITURE, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
