Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stamps III v. Zarinebaf et al
as 1:2021cv04347
Plaintiff:
John C Stamps III
Defendant:
Virginia Zarinebaf, Bruzeller Epps, Mary Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stamps v. Zarinebaf et al
as 1:2021cv04333
Plaintiff:
John C. Stamps, III
Defendant:
Virginia Zarinebaf, Bruzeller Epps, Mary Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Menghistab v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv02927
Defendant:
Jean King, David Whetmore, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Mathusala Menghistab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Lewis, et al v. Walmart Inc., et al
as 21-1662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS E. LEWIS and KELLY KING
Defendant / Appellee:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, WALGREENS CORPORATION and WALMART INC.
Charleston King v. Justin Young, et al
as 21-1613
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANNE TATMAN, JUSTIN YOUNG, JENNIFER PRICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLESTON M. KING
In Re: Ex Parte Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 for an Order to Take Discovery of Brian King for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
as 1:2021cv01323
Plaintiff:
Dismatrix SPC, Polysyndeton and Asyndeton
In Re:
Ex Parte Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 for an Order to Take Discovery of Brian King for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
Ex Parte Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 for an Order to take Discovery of Brian for use in a Foreign Proceeding et al King
as 1:2021cv00919
Petitioner:
Duffy Trust, Michael Dietzen, Michael R Shea and others
In Re:
Ex Parte Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 for an Order to take Discovery of Brian for use in a Foreign Proceeding
Respondent:
Brian King
USA v. Michael King
as 21-1226
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. KING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
