Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Mohammad Khan v. John Blakey
as 17-1735
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD W. KHAN
Respondent:
JOHN ROBERT BLAKEY
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Mohammad Khan
as 17-1567
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD W. KHAN
Mohammad Khan v. John Blakey
as 17-1556
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD W. KHAN
Respondent:
JOHN ROBERT BLAKEY
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shaheena Khan, et al v. Board of Education of the City, et al
as 17-1029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHEENA KHAN, E.K.B., a minor child and LOCAL SCHOOL COUNCIL FOR ALDRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, KAREN SAFFOLD, ELIZABETH KIRBY, individually and others
Khan et al v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08668
Defendant:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago and Karen Saffold
Plaintiff:
Shaheena Khan and E K B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al v. America's Wholesale Lender, Inc. et al
as 4:2014mc00002
Plaintiff:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Defendant:
America's Wholesale Lender, Inc., Dennis L Bell, Cheri B English and others
Cross_claimant:
First American Title Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
America's Wholesale Lender, Inc., Dennis L Bell, Jan Van Eck and others
Sami Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3385
Petitioner:
SAMI ULLAH KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Mazher Khan
as 13-2662
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAZHER ALI KHAN, also known as SAM
Sami Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-2106
Petitioner:
SAMI ULLAH KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
