Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Muhammad Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-3461
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD A. KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Federova v. Nesbit et al
as 1:2012cv07947
Plaintiff:
Elena Federova
Defendant:
Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit, Ronald Kapustka, John H. Bickley, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Faryal Ahmed, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-2547
Petitioner:
FARYAL A. AHMED and MUHAMMAD A. KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Muhammad Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-2267
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD A. KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Nasiruddin Khan v. Tarfa Fatima
as 12-1692
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NASIRUDDIN KHAN
Defendant - Appellant:
FATIMA TARFA
Nasiruddin Khan v. Tarfa Fatima
as 1:2012cv01270
Petitioner:
Nasiruddin Khan
Respondent:
Fatima Tarfa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan v. National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants
as 1:2011cv06124
Plaintiff:
Abrar Khan
Defendant:
National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Fine Cuts, Inc. et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Fine Cuts, Inc., Mohammad Y. Khan and Zahir Mukhtar Bajwa
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, Administrative Appeal Unit of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Khan et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2009cv07744
Plaintiff:
Mouhammad Amir Khan, Muhammad Tahir Khan and Safiya Begum
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Janice L. Jacobs, Anne W. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mona Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3882
Petitioner:
MONA KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
