Cases 41 - 50 of 51
National Roofing Contractors A, et al v. LABR, et al
as 11-1340
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, KORELLIS ROOFING, INCORPORATED, TILSEN ROOFING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, HILDA L. SOLIS, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and others
Fielder v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2010cv05987
Plaintiff:
Richard Fielder
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor and Ronald G Whiting
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Beverly Robinson v. LABR
as 10-1587
Petitioner:
BEVERLY E. ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervening Respondent:
MORGAN STANLEY, DFS SERVICES, LLC, KELLY MCNAMARA-CORLEY and others
Menominee Tribal Enterprises v. LABR
as 09-2806
Petitioner:
MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSIN and MENOMINEE TRIBAL ENTERPRISES
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Janice Fleszar v. LABR
as 09-2423
Petitioner:
JANICE M. FLESZAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Donald Formella v. LABR
as 09-2296
Petitioner:
DONALD FORMELLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervening Respondent:
SCHNIDT CARTAGE, INCORPORATED
Rick Jackson v. Hilda Solis
as 09-1809
Petitioner:
RICK JACKSON
Respondent:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Roadway Express Inc v. LABR
as 09-1315
Petitioner:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervening Respondent:
PETER P. CEFALU
Kellogg v. Estate of Flora Lee Burford et al
as 1:2008cv06983
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Kellogg, Esq.
Defendant:
Estate of Flora Lee Burford, Bruce L. Burford, Barbara Moore and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Twin Lakes Diary L.P. v. Chao et al
as 1:2008cv04923
Plaintiff:
Twin Lakes Diary L.P.
Defendant:
Elaine L. Chao and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
