Cases 51 - 60 of 90
O'Donnell et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2014cv07591
Plaintiff:
Michael P. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ljubica Rajkovic v. FBI
as 14-2729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Meyer v. Davila-Velasquez et al
as 1:2014cv04712
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer
Defendant:
Mary Davila-Velasquez, Sasha Peters, Meghan Heinze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Donnell v. Kersch et al
as 1:2014cv03745
Plaintiff:
Michael P O'Donnell
Defendant:
Tara Kersch
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ljubica Rajkovic v. FBI
as 14-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Skrzypek v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2013cv08986
Plaintiff:
James R. Skrzypek
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
People of the State of Illinois v. Tankus
as 1:2013cv05883
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Tankus
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Tamika LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ljubica Rajkovic v. FBI
as 13-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Kimberly Sutherland v. Michele M. Leonhart, et al
as 13-1016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY A. SUTHERLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELE M. LEONHART, Administrator, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States and others
Rajkovic v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2012cv07421
Plaintiff:
Ljubica Rajkovic
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
