Cases 61 - 70 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv50176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Panitch et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 1:2017cv03460
Plaintiff:
Oren Panitch , Gina Davis and Margie Rizika
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis Neurology, P.A. v. Dental Equities, LLC, d/b/a Peer United et al
as 1:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Davis Neurology, P.A.
Defendant:
Dental Equities, LLC, d/b/a Peer United, First Arkansas Bank & Trust and John Does 1 - 10
Movant:
Affiliated Health Care Associates, P.C. , Chicago Chiropractic & Sports Injury Center, LTD , Dr. Robert Gerber and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Iron Workers St. Louis District Council Annuity Trust et al v. United Ironworkers, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01596
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers St. Louis District Council Annuity Trust , Dennis Hellenberg , John Davis and others
Defendant:
United Ironworkers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson
Defendant:
Carol Adams, James Dimas, Michelle Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Escallate, LLC
as 1:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Davis
Defendant:
Escallate, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
