Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Seafarers Pension Plan v. Bradway et al
as 1:2019cv08095
Defendant:
Ronald A. Williams, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Raymond L Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Seafarers Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Shakman, et al v. International Brotherhood, et al
as 19-2772
Defendant:
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL, RICHARD M. DALEY, J.B. PRITZKER, Governor of the State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOREEN LANAHAN, PAUL M. LURIE, KENNETH AYERS and others
Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 700
USA v. Edmund Brixen
as 18-1636
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND J. BRIXEN
In the matter of Edmund Long
as 1:2017cv06346
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Lau
as 1:2014cv04292
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. , EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar L.L.C.
Defendant:
Edmund Lau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gemeny v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv07954
Plaintiff:
Blaine B. Gemeny, III
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Matthew Cate and Ron Barnes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
John Ventre, et al v. Edmund Lopinski, Jr.
as 11-2879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN VENTRE, individually and as representative on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, A New York Corporation and SALVAGE INVESTORS, L.L.C., Member of the Plaintiff Class
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND J. LOPINSKI, JR.
Anthony Wheeler v. Troy Mayes, et al
as 10-8043
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Respondent:
EDMUND BUTKIEWICZ, KEITH LIFTER, TROY MAYES and others
Anthony Wheeler v. Troy Mayes, et al
as 10-8022
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Respondent:
TROY MAYES, EDMUND BUTKIEWICZ, KEITH LIFTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
