Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Winkle v. Joliet Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv04527
Plaintiff:
Anthony Van Winkle
Defendant:
Joliet Police Department, Anthony Hart-Davi, Banning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Juan Santiago Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTIAGO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Santiago v. Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC
as 1:2022cv05784
Petitioner:
Juan Santiago
Respondent:
Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Santiago v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 1:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
Francoise Santiago and Francoise Scaletta Santiago
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Michael Reynolds v. Faisal Ahmed, et al
as 21-3127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
FAISAL AHMED, Doctor, Medical Director, ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden and DEBBIE SANTIAGO
Sameidra Carter v. Illinois Gaming Board, et al
as 21-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMEIDRA CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS GAMING BOARD, KAREN WEATHERS, FRANK SPIZZIRI and others
Michael Reynolds v. Faisal Ahmed, et al
as 21-2436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
FAISAL AHMED, Doctor, Medical Director, ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden and AW SANTIAGO
Michael Reynolds v. Faisal Ahmed, et al
as 21-2437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
FAISAL AHMED, Doctor, Medical Director, ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden and AW SANTIAGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
