Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Sheriff v. Bridgeford Foods Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv03570
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Sheriff, Matthew W. Sheriff and Matthew W. Sheriff
Defendant:
Bridgeford Foods Corporation, Bridgeford Foods Corporation Group Welfare Plan, Cigna Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv03522
Plaintiff:
Latoya White
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Jenkins v. Price Waterhouse Long Term Dis, et al
as 08-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRICE WATERHOUSE LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS L.L.P.
Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Pension Fund et al v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv05045
Plaintiff:
Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Pension Fund and H. W. Ward
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Hostmark Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund et al v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv00712
Plaintiff:
Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Pension Fund and H. W. Ward
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Hostmark Management, Inc. and Hostmark Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Sharon Mondry v. American Family Mutual Insuran
as 07-1109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON MONDRY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERIPREFERRED PPO PLAN and CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
