Cases 11 - 17 of 17
U.S. Bank National Association v. Diaz et al
as 1:2013cv01665
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Diaz, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Midland Funding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
US Bank National Association v. De Santiago et al
as 1:2013cv01672
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Carmen De Santiago, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Midland Funding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
U.S. Bank National Association v. Worrell et al
as 1:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Marilyn Dawn Worrell, Arrow Financial Services L.L.C. and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Pulido et al
as 1:2013cv01245
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Leobardo J. Pulido, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Citibank, National Association as Successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC v. Lyons et al
as 1:2013cv01142
Plaintiff:
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC
Defendant:
Franklin W. Lyons, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and Sharon Kaye Wendt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Beatty v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Beatty
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and Capital One, National Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
