Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Niedzielski et al v. United Airlines, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv06356
Plaintiff:
Adam Niedzielski and renata niedzielski
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, d/b/a Lufthansa German Airlines, UAL Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05225
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Phyllis Carr v. UAL Corporation, et al
as 09-2674
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
PHYLLIS CARR
Appellee:
UAL CORPORATION
Trustee:
WILLIAM T. NEARY
In re: Peter Hoffman
as 08-3429
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
PETER HOFFMAN
Appellee:
UAL CORPORATION
In re: Peter Hoffman
as 08-3428
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
PETER HOFFMAN
Appellee:
UAL CORPORATION
United Airlines Inc v. UMB Bank, National Association
as 08-2824
Debtor:
In the Matter of: UAL CORPORATION
Appellant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Trustee - Appellee:
UMB BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Rogers et al v. Chicago Department of Aviation et al
as 1:2008cv04074
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rogers and Charles Rogers
Defendant:
Chicago Department of Aviation, UAL Corporation, City of Chicago, The and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03397
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03149
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UAL Corporation et al v. Trapp
as 1:2007cv06247
Plaintiff:
UAL Corporation, Joni Techawashi, Frank Colosi and others
Defendant:
Donna M Trapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
