Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Advanced Energy Economy, et al v. FERC
as 20-3039
Petitioner:
ADVANCED ENERGY MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE and ADVANCED ENERGY ECONOMY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
East Kentucky Power Cooperativ v. FERC
as 20-3036
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
EAST KENTUCKY POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.
Allegheny Electric Cooperative v. FERC
as 20-3042
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. FERC
as 20-3032
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
People of the State of Illinoi v. FERC
as 20-2010
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
PSEG Power LLC, et al v. FERC
as 20-2016
Petitioner:
PSEG POWER LLC, PSEG ENERGY RESOURCES & TRADE LLC and PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Exelon Corporation v. FERC
as 20-1819
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
EXELON CORPORATION
Public Utilities Commission of v. FERC
as 20-1849
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Energy Harbor, LLC, et al v. FERC, et al
as 20-1761
Not Yet Classified:
PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP, J-POWER USA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD, CALPINE CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
ENERGY HARBOR, LLC, formerly known as FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS CORP
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
American Public Power Associat, et al v. FERC, et al
as 20-1759
Petitioner:
AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC. and AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Not Yet Classified:
CALPINE CORPORATION, J-POWER USA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD, PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
