Cases 21 - 30 of 411
Troy Grove, et al v. NLRB
as 23-1014
Petitioner:
TROY GROVE, a division of RiverStone Group, Inc. and VERMILION QUARRY, a division of RiverStone Group, Inc.
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NLRB v. Paragon Systems, Inc.
as 22-3257
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.
Capitol Street Surgery Center, LLC v. NLRB
as 22-3178
Petitioner:
CAPITOL STREET SURGERY CENTER, LLC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NLRB v. Elmar Hotel Management, LLC
as 22-3113
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ELMAR HOTEL MANAGEMENT, LLC, d/b/a Inn of Chicago
NLRB v. Paragon Systems, Incorporated
as 22-2853
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Rimowa GmbH v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05523
Plaintiff:
Rimowa GmbH
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 001 Friend Dropshippin Store, 168Small Fortunate Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. The 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Red Cliff Band Of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians and Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Defendant:
The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local v. NLRB
as 22-2674
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 150, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Interested Party:
RIVERSTONE GROUP, INC
NLRB v. USPS
as 22-2617
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
NLRB v. REAP Construction Group, LLC
as 22-2509
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
REAP CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
