Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03365
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Nuoya Jewelry Co., Ltd., Fanxian Suda Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02946
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Xie Ying Ying, Li Jia Yi doing business as BEUU(Deliver in 3 weeks) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02448
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Xinyuan Fashion Apparel Co.,Limited, Fuzhou Jinhao Crafts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Guangzhou Offpricestocks Co., Ltd., Dongguan Baicheng Stainless Steel Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Aimax Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Yiwu Baige International Trade C0., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhongshan Yalaida Daily Necessities Co., Ltd., Xiamen Better Green Life Outdoor Gear Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Henan Better Import Export Trading Co., Ltd., Jinjiang Superstarer Import & Export Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Sichuan Aimaylen Technology Co., Ltd., NineFox Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Nebula Empire Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao Puyuan Sheng International Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fear of God, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Fear of God, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Ai-Mich Science And Technology Limited, Quanzhou Chuanhe Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
