Cases 71 - 80 of 213
Betts v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09583
Plaintiff:
Carl Betts
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis plc, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barefield et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09566
Plaintiff:
Richard Keith Barefield and Linda Barefield
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., Actavis plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strawn v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09482
Plaintiff:
James Strawn
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09489
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzales
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Actavis PLC et al
as 1:2015cv09505
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fisher
Defendant:
Actavis PLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicholas v. Actavis plc et al
as 1:2015cv09503
Plaintiff:
Willie Nicholas
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ast v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09440
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis PLC and Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Conrad Ast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Actavis plc et al
as 1:2015cv09454
Plaintiff:
Jerry Roberts and Debra Roberts
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holding v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09439
Plaintiff:
Raland Holding
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis plc, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coker et al v. Actavis plc et al
as 1:2015cv09257
Plaintiff:
Charlton R Coker, Jr. and Janet Coker
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
