Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Gonzalez v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Gladys Gonzalez
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yepez Jr v. Citibank, N.A.,
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Yepez Jr
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Citibank, N.A. v. Interface Protein Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
Interface Protein Technology Inc., Charles Xiao Qing Han and Mindy Mingxia Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snyder et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv11675
Plaintiff:
Keith Snyder , Susan Mansanarez and Tracee A. Beecroft
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. , Wilmington Trust, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patera v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv06270
Plaintiff:
Marci Patera
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patera v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv50188
Plaintiff:
Marci Patera
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. , CitiMortgage, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Citibank , N.A.
as 1:2016cv05768
Plaintiff:
James/Elsie Charles
Defendant:
Citibank , N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Zachman v. Citibank, N.A., et al
as 16-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. ZACHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIBANK, N.A. and CITICORP/CITIBANK
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv05409
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04950
Plaintiff:
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
