Cases 71 - 80 of 742
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Robinette Demolition, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06908
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Robinette Demolition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Preston Construction, LLC
as 1:2022cv07018
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Preston Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Accu Flow Floors, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06142
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Health & Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Accu Flow Floors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Design By Three Construction, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06929
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Design By Three Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Onus Construction, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06727
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Onus Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Ewert et al
as 1:2022cv05367
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Mary E. Ewert, Esq Adam Mann, Cohen & Cohen P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Electrical Insurance Trustees Health & Welfare Fund v. Ebert et al
as 1:2022cv05809
Plaintiff:
ELECTRICAL INSURANCE TRUSTEES HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
Norman Ebert, DONALD I. BURNES and BURNES & LIBMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Cosio Construction Company
as 1:2022cv05397
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Cosio Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund et al v. Eirene Builders, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05889
Plaintiff:
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Pension Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Welfare Fund, Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council Retiree Health & Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Eirene Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Ratliff et al
as 1:2022cv05537
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund, Charles A. Whobrey, Scott Elliot Smith L.P.A. and others
Defendant:
Earl Ratliff, Paula K Ratliff, Scott Elliot Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
