Cases 71 - 80 of 492
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bornstein et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Defendant:
Ur M Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and Alejandro N Mayorkas
Plaintiff:
Galyna Bornstein and Jeffrey Bornstein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PETROVIC v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04160
Defendant:
Ted H Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
JELENA PETROVIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Patel et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv04181
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Director Laura B. Zuchowski
Plaintiff:
Sangeeta Y Patel and yogeshkumar k patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Santana Isaac v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04015
Defendant:
Ur M Jaddou, Director Kevin J. Riddle and Alejandro Mayorkas
Petitioner:
Jeisy Santana Isaac
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
