Cases 81 - 90 of 317
NLRB v. Apollo Health, Inc.
as 17-3270
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
APOLLO HEALTH, INC.
NLRB v. ABM Industries Group, LLC
as 17-3158
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ABM INDUSTRIES GROUP, LLC
Responder:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 727
Paul Hitterman v. Universal Security, Inc.
as 17-2990
Petitioner - Appellee:
PAUL HITTERMAN, Acting Regional Director of Region 13 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL SECURITY, INC.
National Labor Relations Board v. Team Company
as 3:2017mc00050
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Team Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Unique Personnel Consultants Inc
as 3:2017mc00049
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Unique Personnel Consultants Inc
Daniel Nelson v. Advocate Health and Hospitals
as 17-2755
Petitioner - Appellee:
DANIEL P. NELSON, Acting Regional Director of Region 13 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant:
ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
NLRB v. Perkins Management Service
as 17-2529
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
PERKINS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
NLRB v. Jam Productions, Limited, et al
as 17-2111
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
JAM PRODUCTIONS, LIMITED, EVENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., STANDING ROOM ONLY, INC. and others
Party-in-Interest:
THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 2 I.A.T.S.E.
Jam Productions, Limited, et al v. NLRB
as 17-2042
Petitioner:
JAM PRODUCTIONS, LIMITED, EVENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., STANDING ROOM ONLY, INC. and others
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NLRB v. Edward L. Calvert
as 17-1895
Appellant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Debtor - Appellee:
EDWARD L. CALVERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
