Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Air Liquid Systems Inc, et al
as 3:2021cv00519
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, as successor-by-merger to WHITE CONSOLDATED INDUSTRIES, as successor-by-merger to COPES VULCAN, INC., GARDNER DENVER, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
AUSTIN, FRANCIS v. THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY
as 3:1997cv00411
Plaintiff:
Francis Austin , William Carlson , Thomas Cunningham and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, C S R, Ltd., Chicago Firebrick Company and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MACIEJEWSKI, RAPHAEL v. AMICON
as 3:1997cv00193
Plaintiff:
Raphael Maciejewski , Robert Beranek , Pern Opland and others
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, Csr Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
COGHLAN, DONALD v. CBS CORPORATION
as 3:1997cv00154
Plaintiff:
Donald Coghlan , Laurence Kappel , John Hendricks and others
Defendant:
The Anchor Packing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company , C S R, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
