Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Antonio Sanchez v. Bank of America Home Loans, et al
as 10-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO P. SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS, NATIONS FIRST LENDING, INC., ALCA CORPORATION, DBA Home Funders Financial and others
Davis Moreno Construction, Inc v. Frontier Steel Buildings Corpo
as 09-17762
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVIS MORENO CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
FRONTIER STEEL BUILDINGS CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation
Armando Gonzalez v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
as 09-17676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and CENTRAL COAST ONE STOP MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
Francisco Cazares v. Homeq Servicing, et al
as 09-17539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CAZARES
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMEQ SERVICING, WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and others
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sun Community Federal Credit U
as 09-55665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
SUN COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a credit union chartered under federal law
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Arelma, Inc., et al
as 09-15573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland and ENC CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, with an address at 232 Paula Lynn Drive, Silver Spring, MD0904
Defendant - Appellee:
THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS, receiver, Felix Dacanay, GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia, with a registered office at 710 West First Street, Blue Ridge, Georgia 30513, and a mailing address at 260 Carrollton St., Buchanan, GA 30113 and MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Cape Haze Investments Ltd, et al v. Richard Eiler
as 09-35228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAPE HAZE INVESTMENTS LTD and THOMAS C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD D. EILERS, and his marital community
Hye Shin v. You Rim Corporation
as 08-17291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HYE LIN SHIN
Defendant - Appellant:
YOU RIM CORPORATION
Merrill Lynch, v. Arelna, Inc., et al
as 04-16401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in New York, New York
Defendant:
ENC CORPORATION, SUNTRUST INVESTMENT CO., S.A., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland with an address at rue de Jargonnant 2, P.O. Box 76, 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland, JOHN K. BURNS, a citizen of the United States, with an address at 300 Wacker Drive, Suite, 900, Chicago, Illinois, 60606; THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCO; IMELDA R. MARCO; FERDINAND R. MARCO, JR.; MARIA IMELDA MARCOS; IRENE MARCOS ARANETA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ARELMA, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Panama with a permanent address at Ave. Justo Alosemena y Calle 41 Este, No. 40-59 Pte al Colegio Immeculada, Panama 1.Rep.de Panama, and a mailing address at c/o Suntrust Invenstment Co and PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIANO J. PIMENTAL, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
