Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55625
Plaintiff:
CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant:
AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified:
DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
Linda Pennington, et al v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al
as 22-15908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINDA PARKER PENNINGTON, GREG PENNINGTON, SAN FRANCISCO SHIPYARD RESIDENTS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TETRA TECH EC, INC., TETRA TECH, INC. and ANDREW BOLT
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNAR CORPORATION, HPS1 BLOCK 50, LLC, FIVEPOINT HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant:
BILL DOUGHERTY, NICK ZAFERES and ONE TREASURE ISLAND
Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, et al v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55629
Plaintiff:
CHANDRALEKHA WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, RAJASKARAN WICKRAMASEKARAN, individually and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust, EAST MEETS WEST EXCURSIONS and others
Defendant:
AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware, limited liability company and SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY
Not Yet Classified:
M/V BEIJING, erroneously sued as the M/V Cosco Beijing and CAPETANISSA MARITIME CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
DORDELLAS FINANCE CORPORATION and MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A.
BWD Properties 2, LLC, et al v. Robert Franklin, et al
as 22-15799
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BWD PROPERTIES 2, LLC, BWD PROPERTIES 3, LLC and BWD PROPERTIES 4, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT LEE FRANKLIN, BOBBY DEAN FRANKLIN and DONNA SUE OWENS
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEN FRANKLIN, DBA Daydream Land & Systems Development Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michelle Schurg, et al v. USA
as 22-35193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE SCHURG, DANIEL SCHURG, CHAD MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jeffrey Jones, et al v. State Farm General Insurance C
as 22-15285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY M. JONES and SHANNON B. JONES, Trustees of the Jeffrey & Shannon Jones Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Mary Rogers v. Donna Allred, et al
as 22-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY A. NELSON ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA ALLRED, Sacramento County Clerk Recorder, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, INC.
Ali Poorsina v. New Penn Financial, LLC, et al
as 22-15239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI POORSINA and ALI R. POORSINA
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, DBA Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series IM1-2005, FDBA Bank of New York
County of Maui v. Chevron USA Inc., et al
as 21-15318
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC., ALOHA PETROLEUM LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
David Davoyan, et al v. Central Bank Rep. of Turkey, et al
as 13-55742
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARBIS DAVOYAN, DAVID DAVOYAN, Administrator of the Estate of Garbis Tavit Davoyan, Deceased and HRAYR TURABIAN, individually on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, The and T.C. ZIRAAT BANKASI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
