Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Terrence Whitcomb v. Jana Moser, et al
as 23-55723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE WHITCOMB, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JANA MOSER, an individual, DOES 1 THROUGH 20, inclusive and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Bruzzone v. James McManis, et al
as 22-16474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES MCMANIS, WILLIAM FAULKNER and WILLIAM HASKELL ALSUP
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chris Kline v. Ram Koppaka, et al
as 18-16559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WARD KLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAM KOPPAKA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Tommy LaNier v. Kean McAdam, et al
as 17-56317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY LANIER
Defendant - Appellee:
KEAN MCADAM
Defendant:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CALIFORNIANS FOR DRUG FREE YOUTH, INC., AKA CADFY
James Murphy v. USA
as 17-35614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Johnson v. USA, et al
as 16-16736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Lonnie Schmidt, et al v. USA, et al
as 14-15725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE G. SCHMIDT, CONNIE J. SCHMIDT, DANIEL G. SCHMIDT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TIMOTHY G. ASHTON, ANTONIO AMADOR and others
Sibyl Alexander v. USA, et al
as 13-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIBYL RENA ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ARMY
Joseph Etherage, et al v. Johnny West, et al
as 13-35368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ETHERAGE and KIRSTIN ETHERAGE, and the marital community thereof
Defendant:
JOHNNY L WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mykal Ryan v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 11-56494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYKAL S. RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LEE THOMPSON, individually, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
