Other Personal Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Victor Sanchez, et al v. Albertson's LLC
as 22-16299
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICTOR SANCHEZ
Appellant: JORDAN P. SCHNITZER, Counsel for Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee: ALBERTSON'S LLC
Paula Garcia Rivera, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-55461
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAULA GARCIA RIVERA, individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest and ESTATE OF GERARDO CRUZ-SANCHEZ, by and through his successor-in-interest Paula Garcia Rivera
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID LANDIN, C.O., in his individual and official capacities, CORECIVIC, INC., FKA Corrections Corporation of America and DOES, 1-20, inclusive
Paula Garcia Rivera, et al v. David Landin, et al
as 22-55462
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAULA GARCIA RIVERA, individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest and ESTATE OF GERARDO CRUZ-SANCHEZ, by and through his successor-in-interest Paula Garcia Rivera
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID LANDIN, C.O., in his individual and official capacities and CORECIVIC, INC., FKA Corrections Corporation of America
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES, 1-20, inclusive
James Steinle, et al v. City and County of San Fran, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16283
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES STEINLE, individually and as heir to Kathryn Steinle, deceased and ELIZABETH SULLIVAN, individually and as heir to Kathryn Steinle, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a government entity, JUAN FRANCISCO LOPEZ-SANCHEZ, ROSS MIRKARIMI and others
Roderick Mitchell v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15168
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODERICK L. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and JAMES C. SANCHEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?