Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Jeffrey Lannes, et al v. Flowserve U.S., Inc., et al
as 13-56397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. LANNES, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vernon P. Lannes and KRISTI JOHNSON
Defendant:
FLOWSERVE U.S., INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interst to Edward Valve, Inc. and JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN PUMPS, LLC
Jeffrey Lannes, et al v. Flowserve U.S., Inc.
as 13-56391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. LANNES, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vernon P. Lannes and KRISTI JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOWSERVE U.S., INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interst to Edward Valve, Inc.
Jeffrey Lannes, et al v. Flowserve U.S., Inc., et al
as 13-56393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. LANNES, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vernon P. Lannes and KRISTI JOHNSON
Defendant:
FLOWSERVE U.S., INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interst to Edward Valve, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-16864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Dimitris Couscouris, et al v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc., et al
as 12-56446
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIMITRIS O. COUSCOURIS and MAGDALENA COUSCOURIS
Defendant:
HATCH GRINDING WHEELS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, FKA P Lorillard Co
Defendant - Appellee:
METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION, SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC., sued individually and as success-in-interest to Norton Company and YEAGER ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Pacific Abrasive Supply Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
