Antitrust Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court: In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor: AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae: ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Seattle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Amicus Curiae: ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DAN CLARK, TAMI DUNLAP, ALI HASSON, JENNIFER IMMEL, GARY KUNZE, ELISABETH LOWE, DALE MONTZ, ABDI MOTAN, FREDERICK RICE, MICHAEL RIEBS, and FIREW TESHOME. and LYFT, INC.
Chamber of Commerce of the Uni, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-35371
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?