Cases 1 - 10 of 566
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 22-56206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC, ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Appellee:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Hodl Law, PLLC v. USSEC
as 23-55810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HODL LAW, PLLC
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Luis Pino v. Cardone Capital, LLC, et al
as 21-55564
Defendant / Appellee:
CARDONE CAPITAL, LLC, GRANT CARDONE, CARDONE EQUITY FUND VI, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS PINO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Appellee:
CALPRIVATE BANK
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Lin Shen, et al v. Progenity, Inc., et al
as 23-55716
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PROGENITY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIN SHEN, LINGJUN LIN and FUSHENG LIN, Lead Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGENITY, INC., HARRY STYLLI, ERIC D'ESPARBES and others
Max Royal LLC, et al v. Atieva, Inc., et al
as 23-16049
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CCIV / LUCID MOTORS SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX ROYAL LLC, SEUNG R. LEE, HEE K. LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ATIEVA, INC., DBA Lucid Motors and PETER RAWLINSON
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Fiyyaz Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc., et al
as 20-16419
Defendant / Appellant:
ACCEL GROWTH FUND INVESTORS 2016 L.L.C., GRAHAM SMITH, SOCIAL+CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP GP II L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FIYYAZ PIRANI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION and others
Clifford Rosen, et al v. Taylor Woods, et al
as 23-55618
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLIFFORD A. ROSEN, an individual and RONALD A. CHRISTENSEN, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
TAYLOR WOODS, an individual and JASON BIRT, an individual
Defendant:
URBAN COMMONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, URBAN COMMONS 6TH AVE SEATTLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, URBAN COMMONS BATTERY PARK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
