Cases 81 - 90 of 326
USA v. King Mountain Tobacco Company,
as 14-36055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Jerold Gorski v. IRS
as 14-56617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROLD M. GORSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
USA v. Joel Boyce, et al
as 14-56610
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOEL L. BOYCE and DELYNN E. BOYCE
Sixty-Three Strategic Investme, et al v. USA
as 14-16665
Petitioner - Appellee:
SIXTY-THREE STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FUNDS and PRESIDO GROWTH LLC
Intervenor - Appellant:
J. PAUL REDDAM and CLARENCE VENTURES, LLC
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Maggie Lin
as 14-56361
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAGGIE LIN
Bedrock Financial, Inc. v. USA, et al
as 14-16505
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant - Appellee:
BEDROCK FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
USA v. Cathy Hill
as 14-16333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY L. HILL, originally named as Cathy L Jordan
USA v. Cathy Hill
as 14-35590
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY L. HILL, originally named as Cathy L Jordan
Bedrock Financial, Inc. v. USA, et al
as 14-16244
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant:
BEDROCK FINACIAL, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-party-defendant - Appellant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
USA v. John Hom
as 14-16214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. HOM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.